Maybe using a water pump:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-tXe_jnWIs

    Mark Jordan


On 06-Dec-12 20:46, David Roberson wrote:
Brad, If you place a large flywheel on the shaft, you will get a much slower decay in speed. Also, the efficiencies of the motor and the generator directly impact the energy loss of the system.

So, take an efficient generator and connect it to an efficient motor while driving a large flywheel and it will continue to turn for a long time.

Dave


-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Lowe <ecatbuil...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:WITTS 3kW Generator Video


I can't find a very similar demo on youtube where a guy ran a drill.. Looked like it was filmed in the Philippians or but can't find it..

Here is a video showing what should happen when you try to power a motor with a generator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl57y-c_bWc

Goes dead pretty quickly.

- Brad


On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Esa Ruoho <esaru...@gmail.com <mailto:esaru...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:44 PM, James Bowery <jabow...@gmail.com
    <mailto:jabow...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        The idea that WITTS is an on-going organization with 200 years
        of history is bizarre.  While its reasonable to deride
        criticism of technological development on the basis of the
        engineer's religious beliefs, the claim that Nicola Tesla, and
        prior scientists, were members of an organization that exists
        to this day, but which has no  historical record other than
        the testimony of one man, has the ring of an MK-ULTRA op if
        not outright insanity.


    Yeah, this is the part that I don't really care about. I mean,
    when I spoke with them for a few hours on the phone, they said
    something similar to Faraday and Maxwell having been involved in
    this or that. I don't understand the reason for saying something
    like that, but I don't consider it to be any reason to not fund
    them, they have their own reasons for it.

    I don't know if it's a kind of "we have 15 to 45 books" kind of
    thing (when someone actually has 8 or 10 books), or what's going
    on, but overall, the u.s. peeps have neat lotteries in there (or
    so we poor scandinavians are lead to misbelieve) ranging from 250
    to 350 million dollars as a first prize so to throw 15 or 35
    million to WITTS/Thrapp people would still leave a ton of funding
    for other projects (such as Erik Dollard (who is on Indiegogo) and
    John Hutchison (who is on Gofundme). And then pick up some paypal
    addresses for Tom Bearden, Dale Pond, Paul Pantone and so on. Call
    it risk-money or what you will, but it would surely sort out the
    wheat from the chaff very quickly - by allowing one to directly
    see how these people are progressing and what they do with the money.



Reply via email to