Please help me understand what is being suggested by these experiments. Are
they supposed to be based upon the belief that mechanical energy can be
converted into electrical energy and then back into mechanical energy with a
net gain? If this is the expectation then it would violate the CoE which is
not possible. Show a source of energy that is being depleted and you will get
a vote of confidence.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: MJ <feli...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 6:00 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:WITTS 3kW Generator Video
Maybe using a water pump:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-tXe_jnWIs
Mark Jordan
On 06-Dec-12 20:46, David Roberson wrote:
Brad, If you place a large flywheel on the shaft, you will get a much
slower decay in speed. Also, the efficiencies of the motor and the
generator directly impact the energy loss of the system.
So, take an efficient generator and connect it to an efficient motor
while driving a large flywheel and it will continue to turn for a long
time.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Brad Lowe <ecatbuil...@gmail.com>
To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Thu, Dec 6, 2012 4:29 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:WITTS 3kW Generator Video
I can't find a very similar demo on youtube where a guy
ran a drill.. Looked like it was filmed in the Philippians or
but can't find it..
Here is a video showing what should happen when you try to
power a motor with a generator:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hl57y-c_bWc
Goes dead pretty quickly.
- Brad
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Esa Ruoho
<esaru...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 7:44 PM, James Bowery
<jabow...@gmail.com> wrote:
The idea that WITTS is an on-going organization with
200 years of history is bizarre. While its
reasonable to deride criticism of technological
development on the basis of the engineer's religious
beliefs, the claim that Nicola Tesla, and
prior scientists, were members of an
organization that exists to this day, but which has
no historical record other than the testimony of
one man, has the ring of an MK-ULTRA op if not
outright insanity.
Yeah, this is the part that I don't really care about. I
mean, when I spoke with them for a few hours on the phone,
they said something similar to Faraday and Maxwell having
been involved in this or that. I don't understand the
reason for saying something like that, but I don't
consider it to be any reason to not fund them, they have
their own reasons for it.
I don't know if it's a kind of "we have 15 to 45 books"
kind of thing (when someone actually has 8 or 10 books),
or what's going on, but overall, the u.s. peeps have neat
lotteries in there (or so we poor scandinavians are lead
to misbelieve) ranging from 250 to 350 million dollars as
a first prize so to throw 15 or 35 million to WITTS/Thrapp
people would still leave a ton of funding for
other projects (such as Erik Dollard (who is on
Indiegogo) and John Hutchison (who is on Gofundme). And
then pick up some paypal addresses for Tom Bearden, Dale
Pond, Paul Pantone and so on. Call it risk-money or what
you will, but it would surely sort out the wheat from the
chaff very quickly - by allowing one to directly see how
these people are progressing and what they do with
the money.
