Dave, Have you identifided the difference (or error) in MFMP team's program that leads them to find excess power?
Harry On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 12:54 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: > The guys at MFMP are still experimenting on the Celani device. They have a > stainless steel version that is just now beginning to be tested and I have > my fingers crossed. A new calorimeter is also being perfected and it will > be capable of detecting excess power in a sensitive manner if any appears. > > My program suggests that the results are null at this time, but others may > not share that opinion. > > The MFMP guys are doing a wonderful job and we all should be appreciative of > their efforts, and I am confident that they will continue to perform a > great service for us. > > Dave > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Fri, Feb 1, 2013 10:56 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Simulation of Celani Replication by MFMP > > I'm not sure the MFMP have shown more than a null result -- I doubt it can > be taken as a negative result. Celani's P_xs was on the order of many > watts, if I remember correctly. It seems like he would have had to have > some pretty egregious instrument artifact to get those graphs that have been > circulating. Also possible is that MFMP have not succeeded in triggering > whatever Celani has been seeing. > > This is not to say that Celani has necessarily been seeing anything -- he > might or he might not be. > > Eric >
