Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > First, the fact that this *source* of energy thousands of times more dense >> than chemical has to be plugged in (to a high power line, no less) will >> turn most observers away. >> > > Fine, so "most observers" will be turned away by this. From an > engineering perspective, I see perfectly good reasons for it. >
It seems like a useful filter. Observers who turn away for this reason do not understand the claim. They do not understand energy. It is better for everyone if they turn away at an early stage. However many turn away, I am sure large numbers will remain. The traffic LENR-CANR.org reveals that there is widespread interest in this test. Actually, the only observers who matter are the people at Elforsk. They have already stated they believe the results. "The measurements show that the catalyst gives substantially more energy than can be explained by ordinary chemical reactions. The results are very remarkable." Who cares what anyone else thinks? We don't need a lot of supporters at this stage. A few institutions such as Elforsk is all the support we need. - Jed
