Let's take this discussion off list. ***NO!! It is utterly relevant to how your assessment of this technology evolved over just a couple of short weeks and some simple reading by you.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>wrote: > What are you talking about? > > Let's recap in bullet point in case you're having a hard time reading: > > - I don't think impact factor is meaningless and don't care if you > think it is. > - This is why I stated impact factor > 15, which I said I was willing to > honor. > - I am willing to bet someone at 20:1 odds that Rossi is not a fraud. > - You and I both know there are two sides to a bet, the long and the > short. I will go long and short at the right price, with some buffer > for profit. > - I am more than happy to bet that Rossi is a fraud at 1:1 odds. > I'll go all day long on that one. > > Let's take this discussion off list. > > It's not really relevant to other people and I'm not going to change > anything I've said above anytime soon. I will just repeat it. > >
