On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 7:28 PM, blaze spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com>wrote:
> What are you talking about? > > Let's recap in bullet point in case you're having a hard time reading: > ***In case you are having a hard time reading, I will answer each point. But why have you ignored my posts so far? > > - I don't think impact factor is meaningless and don't care if you > think it is. > ***Then show how it aint meaningless. I posted the various articles on LENR-CANR.org that I would like to find the Impact Factor for. I can't find it. You did not respond. > - This is why I stated impact factor > 15, which I said I was willing to > honor. > ***If you are willing to state an impact factor of XYZ then are you willing to honor it? Where can we find these various previous LENR publication journal Impact Factors? > - I am willing to bet someone at 20:1 odds that Rossi is not a fraud. > ***And I am willing to take that bet. But if it happens to be conditional to the stars aligning, then it's a stupid bet. If it happens to be conditional to an "Impact Factor" that doesn't really exist then it's a stupid bet. I'm willing to send $500 right now to a Vortex member who would take 1% commission and decide just on the basis of where we're at right now. Are you? If you're supposedly betting that Rossi is a fraud, then why not bet on a fraud conviction for E-cat technology within the next 18 months? If it's as obvious as you state, then it would be an easy win for you. > - You and I both know there are two sides to a bet, the long and the > short. I will go long and short at the right price, with some buffer > for profit. > ***And you & I both know that you started with 10:1 odds, have gone down to 1:1 and then 1:2, and now I see you posting different odds without having established what Impact Factor is. How about this: If the peer reviewed report is one from a journal that has previously appeared in LENR-CANR.org, then that would be good enough. I'll take those 20:1 odds. > - I am more than happy to bet that Rossi is a fraud at 1:1 odds. > I'll go all day long on that one. > ***I'm more interested in these slippery 10:1 and 20:1 odds that you keep hinting at. > > Let's take this discussion off list. > ***NO. This is educational, regardless of how it turns out. > It's not really relevant to other people and I'm not going to change > anything I've said above anytime soon. I will just repeat it. > > ***You ARE changing it, with each post, and with each ignored post from me. Also, I notice the change in watching your behavior on other internet lists. So... I was interested in 10:1 and very interested in 20:1 odds. If you stop ignoring my posts, we might get to an understanding.
