Edmund Storms <stor...@ix.netcom.com> wrote:

Being one of the old people, I would like to share my impression of this
> issue.
>
> Most young people are ignorant, self-centered, and without much
> imagination. When they become old people, most remain ignorant,
> self-centered, and without imagination. . . .
>

True. But the fact is, nearly all important innovation in science, math and
technology is done by young people. Theoretical physics are mainly a young
person's game. Most innovations in programming are by young people.

There are exceptions of course. Niklaus Wirth published some of his famous
contributions after age 40. But he contributed to theory. Programmers who
made new programs or founded corporations, such as Bill Gates, Wozniak or
Zuckerberg, were usually in their 20s when they did their best work.
(People criticize Gates, but he wrote some excellent software back in the
1970s, when you consider the limitations of the early personal computers.
So did I, if I do say say so myself.)

In the case of cold fusion, I think Martin came up with some of the ideas
when he was young, but he put off implementing them. Also, he was aware of
work in the 1920s and 30s that pointed to cold fusion.

Older people make important contributions to literature, music and graphic
arts, especially painting. Monet painted some of his masterpieces a few
years before he died, which were unlike anything in his youth, and unlike
anything anyone painted before.

Older people sometimes make important contributions to natural science,
biology, other observational sciences, and archaeology. These things depend
on a large base of knowledge and experience, rather than intuition or a new
perspective unencumbered with older ideas.

In physics, generally speaking, Planck's other constant holds. Progress
occurs funeral by funeral. Regrettably, in cold fusion, the wrong gang of
old coots are dying off. Also, we have a unfortunate generational role
reversal, because of social and economic circumstances. See:

http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/RothwellJcomparison.pdf

- Jed

Reply via email to