"Obviously it can, since it has been." I long ago realized never to say something like this publicly unless
- I had personally done it myself - Someone everyone trusts had done it On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:40 AM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Blaze Spinnaker <blazespinna...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> No. I think you're caught up in some sort of conspiracy mindset loop. >> I think there are a lot of people that want to believe but have burned by >> too many measurement errors. >> > > There have not been many measurement errors. I'll bet you can't list more > than five. > > > > >> However, there is a pattern of something. The question is what's >> causing it and can it be scaled up reliably and safely. >> > > Obviously it can, since it has been. > > > > >> Why is this interesting and the previous 14,000 similar experiments not >>> interesting? This is not especially dramatic or clear-cut. >>> >>> >> It's interesting because Toyota is particularly credible. >> > > Are you suggesting that Los Alamos, China Lake, the ENEA or SRI are not > credible? > > - Jed > >
