The proper study of Mills is Mills. Jeff has done notable homework, but in the Technical Presentation found on the website there are summary tables of atomic constants calculated by Mills using classical physics, compared with accepted laboratory measurements. Mills' calculations are accurate to the limits of measurement. Such is a stunning achievement. Mills' calculations use only known, measured physical constants, unlike QM, which is b basically a method of calculation with parameters adjusted for each case [in college, this was called fudging]. Mills does not give derivations for each case, just the result. His calculations are verified by an external mathematician.
Mike Carrell From: Stefan Israelsson Tampe [mailto:stefan.ita...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2014 2:00 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mill's theory behind the hydrino Have you considered setting up a sage calculation sheet on a webserver with formulas and equations easy verifiable in the sheet, that would be impressive way to show that the math works and could be a nice companion to the actual textbook. /Stefan On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Jeff Driscoll <jef...@gmail.com> wrote: have you looked at my website? I describe many details of Mills's theory: http://zhydrogen.com/ Jeff On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> wrote: Hi all, After skimming Mill's book about how he treats the atom physics, I am pretty amazed. Folks, his theory is really accurate, and we should not dismiss it just because of the hydrino prediction. He actually calculates the g factor to the same level as QED, but he indicates it took two decades of fiddling with the QED equations to reach that level of accuracy. So the Math is as right as what we can get by using ordinary QED/QM but Mill's math is much more elegant. One hydrino state is predicted by QED too, but the spinnors are not integrable in QED although probably by combining them lead to an acceptable solution. Also the other states may as well be there but it's probably hard to find them because of the convoluted math. Also we should expect that these hydrino states have as well non integrable spinors. The interesting thing to understand now is what paths the QM/Mill's theory allow to go from a normal state to a hydrino state. In a sense it is degenerate and it looks like these states are locked. In a sense atoms must interact strongly e.g. get really close together and act in a precise way in order to mediate the forming of a hydrino. It is not unlikly that the conditions are very special and rarely happens in normal physics/chemistry. In a sense it's crazy how people treat his work all over the intertubes. They say that his results are wacko. It could be that the math is correct but there is a some extra conditions for the solutions to be physical, that is missing that relates to the integrability conditions for the spinors. Also if there any serious issues with his math I would like to know, else he deserves respect, with or without the hydrino. /Stefan -- Jeff Driscoll 617-290-1998 ________________________________________________________________________ This Email has been scanned for all viruses by Medford Leas I.T. Department.
