From: Mike Carrell 

 

First, BLP is *chemistry*, dealing with electrons, not nuclei, which is the
province of LENR. 

 

This is Mike's opinion, and he has followed BLP as long as any of us. 

 

However, it is not fact. Remember that early on, Mills himself reported
tritium.

 

For many of us - it is illogical to think that similar experiments done with
hydrogen, one done by Mills and another by Piantelli - will not have similar
results; and/or that Mills can magically ordain that LENR and low level
transmutation or tritium will not happen in circumstance where it is known
to happen.

 

Personally, it is my belief that BLP will eventually be shown to be
"chemistry which precedes and sets the stage for LENR" . aka CANR and that
most of the energy comes from LENR. 

 

Now that cell phones can be equipped as radiation monitors, it will be
almost impossible for Mills to continue to hide the fact that his devices
can produce nuclear reactions, even if the rate is tiny. Will guards check
every cell phone on the 28th?

 

At some point, when an actual product is near - even industrial customers
(or their liability insurer) will demand to know the complete truth. The
longer BLP waits to come clean with the facts, the worse will be the
repercussions. 

 

I guess you can that this will be when the CIHT hits the fan :-)

 

Jones

Reply via email to