If they used bomb calorimetry and had an easily quantifiable energy source, like a capacitor bank, for their pulse, then their demo might be good.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > This E-cat World report is vague. > > Since there was no NDA, why didn't this person write a concrete > description of the equipment and instruments? The only technical specific > is that they used "waterbath calorimetry." I don't know what that means. I > guess it means static or bomb calorimetry, rather than flow calorimetry. > Tell us how big the device was, how heavy, how much power and energy went > in, and how much came out. > > Like this, if I do say so myself: > > http://lenr-canr.org/wordpress/?p=643 > > - Jed > >
