Daniel,
Calling Jed a "Liar" and then claiming he is "...throwing a tantrum" over the DGT matter is, IMO, not winning you many converts. Quite frankly, some of your recent posts strike me as possessing an emotionally charged need on your part to play the role of an advocate for DGT's questionable business tactics, as perceived by some on this forum. Personally, I don't know enuf about DGT to feel I can make a judgment call on the matter, either pro or con. At present, I prefer to stay neutral on the matter while carefully taking into account the insights of individuals like Mr. Rothwell, Beene, and others. All I know is that in my experience, ignoring Jed's insights on most CF matters is not a wise thing to do. The last time I observed such a stalwart display of a defense of an organization or business entity was when I was still a board member on New Energy Time's, headed by Steve Krivit. Krivit really liked the Widdom Larson theory. He strongly defended the individuals an organization promoting that theory. Krivit did so while simultaneously casting doubt on the professional reputation of a certain well respected CF researcher who was recently interviewed on 60 minutes. Obviously, you are not Mr. Krivit. What I'm trying to say here is that I would recommend that you try to find some neutrality on the subject. You are not neutral on this subject. You will eventually lose if don't find neutrality. Regards, Steven Vincent Johnson svjart.orionworks.com
