More... Going from carbon and water to nickel is a LENR reaction that requires the injection of a good deal of energy to occur. Since carbon are water are low Z elements that transmute to high Z elements, just about all the elements produced require external energy for the reaction to occur. Mizuno is not the only experiments to show endothermic energy input.
In this experiment the possible source of the energy is the electric arc. On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-297/aflb297m329.pdf > > > > *Low Energy Induced Nuclear Fusion Via Coherence* > > *Of The Quantum Vacuum, Zero-Point Energy* > > *Through Ultra Close Range Casimir Effects* > > > > Page 1119 > > > > The analysis of the carbon residue is tabulated below for the four > > samples collected as described earlier. The last column is one set of > typical > > DC Arc Spectroscopy results provided for comparison that were reported by > > Singh, et al of B.A.R.C in their 1994 carbon arc in water experiment > reported > > in *Fusion Technology*. > > > > 18 elements were transmuted from pure carbon and pure water via an > electric arc. See table. > > > > Any theory of LENR must explain any experiment result ever performed and > account for any of those experimental results. This criticism is part of > the peer review process. The person who produced the theory might well > consider the criticism as a service and amend his theory for the better. > This is not an EMOTIONAL process involving loyalty, or politics, but one of > science in the quest to arrive at perfect truth. > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Lennart Thornros <lenn...@thornros.com> > wrote: > >> Hello Axel, >> I do understand that there are good theories and not so good dittos. >> Why so adamant? >> It seems to me that there is a myriad of theories, some of them have >> similarities, some of them exclude each other. >> Very little is won by finding holes in the other theories. >> Problems are many and the lack of experimental data is the main issue. >> Therefore it is hard to have any theory confirmed. >> The well established experiments (BLP, Rossi, etc). are protecting there >> investment and let very little out about their findings. >> I realize that it is expensive and difficult to make experiments. >> However, I think that just now we need to to stop producing more >> theoretical formats and concentrate >> on verifying one theory one step at the time. >> I think Ed Storms have done that and that is what brings credibility to >> his theory. It does not make it right but very few hypothesis >> are better substantiated with actual test data. >> My suggestion is just that. Suggest or do experiments to be done to >> support your own theories instead of finding holes in others ideas. >> I think Brad is on the right track. I am happy to provide the >> microwave:) >> >> Best Regards , >> Lennart Thornros >> >> www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com >> lenn...@thornros.com >> +1 916 436 1899 >> 202 Granite Park Court, Lincoln CA 95648 >> >> “Productivity is never an accident. It is always the result of a >> commitment to excellence, intelligent planning, and focused effort.” PJM >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Ed Storms just gives us one out of a potential million LENR reaction >>> results that have been seen in LENR experimentation. Ed never wanted to >>> consider transmutation as a valid consequence of the LENR reaction. By >>> embracing transmutation, Ed would need to explain countless variations and >>> permutations of the way protons and neutrons could come together as a >>> result of a LENR reaction. >>> >>> The Mizuno results showing an endothermic reaction is not possible in Ed >>> Storms theory. >>> >>> The most flexible explanation of the LENR reaction is one that entails a >>> powerful bolt of energy impacting on an unspecified but variable pile of >>> atoms that result in any sort of recombination of any number of protons and >>> neutrons coming back together. >>> >>> This powerful bolt of energy would supply the power to permit >>> endothermic nuclear processes to proceed. >>> >>> LENR is more like an atom smasher then a tokomak. >>> >>> This contemplation of an endothermic mechanism is a catastrophic >>> sacrilege of epic proportions for Ed because it violates his beloved and >>> inviolable laws of thermodynamics. >>> >>> But the Mizuno results still must be explained by a global theory of >>> LENR. >>> >>> >>> >> >
