as the comment says, it rather says that the theory of fetta is wrong... that fetta cannot design a reactor that don't work by changing what he consider a key detail.
it is a theory failure, not a practical failure. the resonance is important, and this enough let me consider something is real, at worst an artifact that is linked to microwave resonance and not mechanical setup, that was tested for artifacts. 2014-08-02 16:32 GMT+02:00 Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net>: > From: John Berry > > More on the null test... > > > http://www.reddit.com/r/Futurology/comments/2c8xah/nasa_validates_impossible > _space_drive_wired_uk/cjdg3bh > They say the null test was designed to be null, and yet it > still showed thrust. > > This could mean that the test which was designed to show > thrust and did show thrust cannot be trusted. There are other implications > as well. > > >
