*It Probably Would Have been reported if it DID happen,* Yes, it is a matter of opinion. But I am sure that if it does happen, you won't hear about the explosion from Rossi.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > There's quite a difference between asking what Will Happen and saying that > such & such thing DOES Happen. > > I'm saying such & such a thing Hasn't Been Reported. It Probably Would > Have been reported if it DID happen, so I'm stretching the inductive > reasoning to It Probably Didn't Happen unless you have evidence it Did > Happen rather than postulation that it Might Happen. > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On meltdown, the Rossi reactor has 3 or 4 bars or may be more of >> compressed 2000C hydrogen in the reaction chamber. What will happen when >> that hydrogen hit the air upon reaction chamber failure? >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> First I've heard of such a thing. The meltdowns I've heard about have >>> simply been that: meltdowns, not explosions. Pons & Fleischmann had >>> theirs melt through several inches of concrete flooring. No big deal. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C and when the >>>> hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and plasma in >>>> all directions and for a long distance. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Actually, statistical control is a reasonably strong approach. I take >>>>> ethernet as an example. >>>>> >>>>> 10/100 Mbit ethernet was once dominated by National Semiconductor, >>>>> heavily relying on their analog background to control tightly the >>>>> parameters involved. They were overtaken by a disruptive technology using >>>>> DSP and statistical "control". It turned out that it made the analog >>>>> simpler, and the digital side of the issue meant that die shrinking took >>>>> place much faster. By the time National spent $120M buying Comcore to >>>>> play >>>>> catchup, their die size was 60% larger than Broadcom. The next generation >>>>> was gigabit ethernet, where the vast majority of the game was with DSP and >>>>> Marvell entered the picture. As each generation of ethernet came out, it >>>>> was more digital, more millions of transistors doing DSP where analog used >>>>> to be, and eventually it was so cheap that we now buy those chips for $2 >>>>> at >>>>> 1Gig/s when they were originally $45 at 0.1Gig/s >>>>> >>>>> By using a statistical approach, Rossi puts himself on the digital >>>>> scaling roadmap rather than the analog scaling roadmap. It has tremendous >>>>> merits. >>>>> >>>>> What is the danger? If an air conditioner goes on during August when >>>>> it ain't hot, what's the harm? If Rossi's device goes kaflooiee in the >>>>> first generation, it will just stop working. By the time the 3rd >>>>> generation rolls out, it will no longer go kaflooiee, and it will be under >>>>> far tighter control than if he had taken the "analog" route. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Statistical control is like saying that most of the time it is hot in >>>>>> august so turn on the air conditioners in august. Most of the time you >>>>>> are >>>>>> correct, but sometimes a bad thing happens. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
