The option is that Rossi would allow that new to leak. Rossi runs a tight ship.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:05 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are plenty of vultures surrounding Rossi. If such a thing happened > or does happen, you'll hear about it. > > a matter of opinion > ***Does this mean you'll be backtracking from your earlier, stronger > statement of "When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C > and when the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal > and plasma in all directions and for a long distance." > > That's far different from "When a Rossi reactor Possibly Might Melt Down, > the reactor Could go to 2000C and (IF THE Hydrogen Doesn't Escape > Beforehand -- which is quite likely ) when the hydrogen Conceivably > explodes, it Could send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and plasma in > all directions and Even Possibly for a long distance." > > That's a bit like quoting the most drastic case of gasoline catching on > fire in automobile collisions. > > > > > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> *It Probably Would Have been reported if it DID happen,* >> >> Yes, it is a matter of opinion. But I am sure that if it does happen, you >> won't hear about the explosion from Rossi. >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> There's quite a difference between asking what Will Happen and saying >>> that such & such thing DOES Happen. >>> >>> I'm saying such & such a thing Hasn't Been Reported. It Probably Would >>> Have been reported if it DID happen, so I'm stretching the inductive >>> reasoning to It Probably Didn't Happen unless you have evidence it Did >>> Happen rather than postulation that it Might Happen. >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On meltdown, the Rossi reactor has 3 or 4 bars or may be more of >>>> compressed 2000C hydrogen in the reaction chamber. What will happen when >>>> that hydrogen hit the air upon reaction chamber failure? >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> First I've heard of such a thing. The meltdowns I've heard about have >>>>> simply been that: meltdowns, not explosions. Pons & Fleischmann had >>>>> theirs melt through several inches of concrete flooring. No big deal. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C and when >>>>>> the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and >>>>>> plasma in all directions and for a long distance. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com >>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Actually, statistical control is a reasonably strong approach. I >>>>>>> take ethernet as an example. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 10/100 Mbit ethernet was once dominated by National Semiconductor, >>>>>>> heavily relying on their analog background to control tightly the >>>>>>> parameters involved. They were overtaken by a disruptive technology >>>>>>> using >>>>>>> DSP and statistical "control". It turned out that it made the analog >>>>>>> simpler, and the digital side of the issue meant that die shrinking took >>>>>>> place much faster. By the time National spent $120M buying Comcore to >>>>>>> play >>>>>>> catchup, their die size was 60% larger than Broadcom. The next >>>>>>> generation >>>>>>> was gigabit ethernet, where the vast majority of the game was with DSP >>>>>>> and >>>>>>> Marvell entered the picture. As each generation of ethernet came out, >>>>>>> it >>>>>>> was more digital, more millions of transistors doing DSP where analog >>>>>>> used >>>>>>> to be, and eventually it was so cheap that we now buy those chips for >>>>>>> $2 at >>>>>>> 1Gig/s when they were originally $45 at 0.1Gig/s >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By using a statistical approach, Rossi puts himself on the digital >>>>>>> scaling roadmap rather than the analog scaling roadmap. It has >>>>>>> tremendous >>>>>>> merits. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What is the danger? If an air conditioner goes on during August >>>>>>> when it ain't hot, what's the harm? If Rossi's device goes kaflooiee in >>>>>>> the first generation, it will just stop working. By the time the 3rd >>>>>>> generation rolls out, it will no longer go kaflooiee, and it will be >>>>>>> under >>>>>>> far tighter control than if he had taken the "analog" route. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Statistical control is like saying that most of the time it is hot >>>>>>>> in august so turn on the air conditioners in august. Most of the time >>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>> are correct, but sometimes a bad thing happens. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
