There are plenty of vultures surrounding Rossi. If such a thing happened or does happen, you'll hear about it.
a matter of opinion ***Does this mean you'll be backtracking from your earlier, stronger statement of "When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C and when the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and plasma in all directions and for a long distance." That's far different from "When a Rossi reactor Possibly Might Melt Down, the reactor Could go to 2000C and (IF THE Hydrogen Doesn't Escape Beforehand -- which is quite likely ) when the hydrogen Conceivably explodes, it Could send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and plasma in all directions and Even Possibly for a long distance." That's a bit like quoting the most drastic case of gasoline catching on fire in automobile collisions. On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > *It Probably Would Have been reported if it DID happen,* > > Yes, it is a matter of opinion. But I am sure that if it does happen, you > won't hear about the explosion from Rossi. > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> There's quite a difference between asking what Will Happen and saying >> that such & such thing DOES Happen. >> >> I'm saying such & such a thing Hasn't Been Reported. It Probably Would >> Have been reported if it DID happen, so I'm stretching the inductive >> reasoning to It Probably Didn't Happen unless you have evidence it Did >> Happen rather than postulation that it Might Happen. >> >> >> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On meltdown, the Rossi reactor has 3 or 4 bars or may be more of >>> compressed 2000C hydrogen in the reaction chamber. What will happen when >>> that hydrogen hit the air upon reaction chamber failure? >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:24 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> First I've heard of such a thing. The meltdowns I've heard about have >>>> simply been that: meltdowns, not explosions. Pons & Fleischmann had >>>> theirs melt through several inches of concrete flooring. No big deal. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 10:12 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> When a Rossi reactor melts down, the reactor goes to 2000C and when >>>>> the hydrogen explodes, it send out 2000C droplets of liquid metal and >>>>> plasma in all directions and for a long distance. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 12:28 AM, Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Actually, statistical control is a reasonably strong approach. I >>>>>> take ethernet as an example. >>>>>> >>>>>> 10/100 Mbit ethernet was once dominated by National Semiconductor, >>>>>> heavily relying on their analog background to control tightly the >>>>>> parameters involved. They were overtaken by a disruptive technology >>>>>> using >>>>>> DSP and statistical "control". It turned out that it made the analog >>>>>> simpler, and the digital side of the issue meant that die shrinking took >>>>>> place much faster. By the time National spent $120M buying Comcore to >>>>>> play >>>>>> catchup, their die size was 60% larger than Broadcom. The next >>>>>> generation >>>>>> was gigabit ethernet, where the vast majority of the game was with DSP >>>>>> and >>>>>> Marvell entered the picture. As each generation of ethernet came out, it >>>>>> was more digital, more millions of transistors doing DSP where analog >>>>>> used >>>>>> to be, and eventually it was so cheap that we now buy those chips for $2 >>>>>> at >>>>>> 1Gig/s when they were originally $45 at 0.1Gig/s >>>>>> >>>>>> By using a statistical approach, Rossi puts himself on the digital >>>>>> scaling roadmap rather than the analog scaling roadmap. It has >>>>>> tremendous >>>>>> merits. >>>>>> >>>>>> What is the danger? If an air conditioner goes on during August when >>>>>> it ain't hot, what's the harm? If Rossi's device goes kaflooiee in the >>>>>> first generation, it will just stop working. By the time the 3rd >>>>>> generation rolls out, it will no longer go kaflooiee, and it will be >>>>>> under >>>>>> far tighter control than if he had taken the "analog" route. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Statistical control is like saying that most of the time it is hot >>>>>>> in august so turn on the air conditioners in august. Most of the time >>>>>>> you >>>>>>> are correct, but sometimes a bad thing happens. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
