The indication that muons are produces in the Ni/H reactor are based on the ash assay that shows heavy production of Lithium, Boron, and beryllium as produced by the Proton Proton reaction. I admit that it is an open quest of how those muons are produced.
Be advised that the magnetic field in the Ni/H system is powered in part by the energy from fusion reactions.. However, the Ni/H reactor produces at best only moderate magnetic fields. It is a moderate system suitable for home instantiation. On the other hand still assuming magnetic field causation is the fundamental LENR causation, LeClair's system produces transuranic elements. To do that, the magnetic fields in that system are high enough to produce a gluon/quark condensate. This cavitation system produces the highest field strength generated so far. In the near future, I will explain how the LeClair system is based on the same principles as the Ni/H reactor but more powerful. By the way, LeClair's system is a LENR system; not hot fusion as some have suggested. LeClair: "The more sensitive LA-ICP-MS detected a total of 78 elements ranging from lithium to californium and 108 isotopes ranging from 7Li to 249Cf, a standard detection set that does not include all the possible isotopes, but including most of the stable isotopes and many short and long lived radioactive isotopes." The only way that this type of transmutation can be done from water and aluminum is through a breakdown of matter into a quark/gluon plasma. Magnetic fields in excess of 10^^16 tesla are needed to accomplish such a feat. This involves a twilight zone level field strength. On Fri, Aug 22, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://arxiv.org/pdf/1203.5699.pdf >> > > The paper you cite talks about the changing masses of ⍴ and A mesons under > strong magnetic fields. It does not talk about meson condensation. It > does mention some interesting points, however: > > - "It is known that cosmic space objects called magnetars or neutron > stars possess magnetic field in their cores equal to ∼ 1 MeV. [sic]" > - "The values of magnetic fields in non-central heavy-ion collisions > can reach up to ... ~ 290 MeV^2" > > Another paper indicates that in the cores of neutron stars [2], where the > magnetic field is ~ 10^15 Tesla, ⍴- mesons *might* condense (the ⍴ meson > is only slightly heavier than the π- meson, which is what we need for > muons). We have a number of degrees of freedom to pin down to get any > closer to our meson condensation: > > - What is the strength of the local magnetic field in a small volume > in DGT's reactor? Is it in the twilight zone? Is it actually pretty > small? > - What is the effect of an extreme magnetic field on the condensation > of π mesons? Does it enhance it? Does it inhibit it? I get the sense it > could go either way. > - How does the environment in a small volume in DGT's reactor compare > to that in the core of a neutron star? Is it as extreme? Is it perhaps > less extreme? > > I'm going to guess that we don't even have a prima facie case to become > interested in the possibility of meson condensation at this point. > > Eric > > > [1] http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf (see > p. 3). > [2] http://arxiv.org/pdf/1408.0139.pdf (see the second half of p. 4). > >
