http://www.simonsfoundation.org/quanta/20140818-at-multiverse-impasse-a-new-theory-of-scale/
Regarding the phase change of scale, as the size of things change, a new theory states that mass, length and energy are effected by a phase change in scale. The laws of physics that should be applied to such a system are sensitive to the scale of the system since the system acts differently as its scale changes. On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Yes, the geometry is very specific – 2-12 nanometers. > > > > Higher or lower spacing is no good. In fact, buckyballs (C60) are just a > bit too small to experience a Casimir effect, but some forms of CNT > (nanotubes) can be part of a Casimir anomaly. > > > > For comparison purposes, a sphere of this size (diameter of 5 nanometers) > could contain about 150-500 atoms. BTW - these spheres are being engineered > in Labs now, and are called quantum dots, and have special electronic > properties which are “apparently unrelated” to the Casimir effect, but also > curious in the sense of being an inverted structure instead of pore. > > > > As it turns out – this dimensional range is also seen in a natural > biological process – bioluminescence. The “firefly” effect happens because > large molecules about the size of a quantum dot, interact via ions to > produce photons of abnormally large energy. This process is called FRET. > > > > FRET (Forster radiant energy transfer) can be called a biological version > of DCE (Dynamical Casimir) effect. This is important for LENR since there > could be a non-fusion thermal anomaly which is related to FRET, and/or DCE, > and which may be involved in the Sheehan papers as well. > > > > *From:* Jed Rothwell > > > > The “pore storage” of course invokes the dynamical Casimir effect. > It can be exothermic. > > > > Would those be very small pores? I believe the Casimir effect only occurs > in very small dimensions. > > > > - Jed > > >
