Hopefully. Or maybe not. If they are ambulatory and have "a light touch of the flu" they are spreading the virus to people who are not so immune for a lot longer duration than if they started exhibiting unmistakable symptoms of Ebola.
On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 11:45 PM, John Berry <berry.joh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Additionally some people get it but are apparently symptom-less beyond a > light touch of the flu. > > This could very well be a nutrition issue, such that those with > insufficient nutrition fail. > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 5:16 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: > >> In reply to David Roberson's message of Wed, 8 Oct 2014 23:40:42 -0400: >> Hi, >> >Is it possible that most people have a natural immunity to the virus >> that prevents them from getting the disease? Those few that are not immune >> then would be the ones that have a low survival rate. >> > >> >If this were the case, the virus might be capable of spreading by way of >> the air. The Spanish lady apparently received a dose of the disease even >> when covered well with the best protection and little apparent body fluid >> contact if any at all. >> > >> >Has it been established that no one has natural immunity or is that just >> an assumption? >> > >> >Dave >> >> If the mortality rate is about 40-60%, doesn't that means that the >> remainder >> have sufficient natural immunity? >> >> Regards, >> >> Robin van Spaandonk >> >> http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/project.html >> >> >
