Risker wrote: > Procedural note to moderators: Perhaps it is time to consider a length > limit on posting? > While I understand where you are coming from, it bears noting that some people would like a limit of length both on the short and the long side, and you would in the eyes of some, fail on the short side of the limit -- as I do often too, not being too particular either way. Not passing judgement long or short, but just noting that both are annoying, even I admit to have rarely done both...
...And I suspect I will do both again. Do note that the current person in charge of the staff serving the foundation, very specifically commended a very long post by Gregory Maxwell that in her view nicely summarised the situation on commons -- albeit that post was at the foundation-l. I don't actually agree with Sue on that particular summary being all that insightful. (Sorry Greg!) But a lengthy summary did in fact please Sue in that particular instance. So making the moderators bar posts like the one by Greg, I think serves no one. Yours, Jussi-Ville Heiskanen _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
