There is a good body research around who participates in deletion discussions 
(particularlyin the English Wikipedia). These studies mostly looked at the 
breakdown by tenure [1] or diversity of participants in AfD discussions or the 
effects of the size of a discussion on its outcome [2])  In [3] we looked 
specifically at evidence of heterogeneity in AfD discussions indicating 
participation by deletionists or inclusionists. We found two classes of users 
who participate in significantly different ways in these discussions (such that 
their !voting behavior is poorly predicted by the baseline probability of an 
average AfD participants, but is predicted much more accurately by the typical 
profile of editors with a "deletion" or "inclusion" tendency). We had no data 
available to determine whether these AfD participants who consistently voted 
for keeping or deleting AfD-nominated pages did so because of some kind of 
!vote stacking via organized action or because of a natural tendency towards 
one of these two stances on deletion.

Dario

[1] Geiger, R. S., & Ford, H. (2011). Participation in Wikipedia’s article 
deletion processes. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and 
Open Collaboration - WikiSym  ’11 (p. 201). New York, New York, USA: ACM Press. 
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038593 - 
http://www.wikisym.org/ws2011/_media/proceedings:p201-geiger.pdf

[2] Lam, S. K., Karim, J., & Riedl, J. (2010). The effects of group composition 
on decision quality in a social production community. Proceedings of the 16th 
ACM international conference on Supporting group work - GROUP  ’10 (p. 55). New 
York, New York, USA: ACM Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1880071.1880083 - 
http://www.grouplens.org/system/files/Lam+Wikipedia+Group+Discussion.pdf

[3] Taraborelli, D., & Ciampaglia, G. L. (2010). Beyond Notability. Collective 
Deliberation on Content Inclusion in Wikipedia. 2010 Fourth IEEE International 
Conference on Self-Adaptive and Self-Organizing Systems Workshop (pp. 122-125). 
Budapest: IEEE. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SASOW.2010.26 - 
http://nitens.org/docs/qteso10.pdf

On Mar 22, 2012, at 12:38 PM, Alan Liefting wrote:

> On 23/03/2012 8:20 a.m., Amir E. Aharoni wrote:
>> 2012/3/22 Alan Liefting<alieft...@ihug.co.nz>:
>>> Does anyone agree with me that the inclusionists are more numerous than the
>>> deletionists around the deletion discussions?
>> If you tell us how you counted, we can try to agree or to disagree.
>> It's pointless to talk about subjective feelings.
> Feelings are by definition subjective. Anyhow, without doing some real 
> in-depth research it will only be subjective.
> 
> Alan
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l

Reply via email to