Patrick H. Lauke wrote: > For less important, there currently isn't an > alternative, so <small> (albeit presentational) > may be the only option ... or just going for a > <span>, which is semantically just as meaningless.
FWIW, I use the small element on my blog, on my latest WordPress theme, and for Accessites [1] -- all use the same theme. On the home page the small element contains the tag line, and it contains the article/page title on inside pages. Like so: <h1><span></span>Accessites.org <small><br />The Art of Accessibility</small></h1>How correct or semantically pure this method is I do not know. I am comfortable with it is all. The span is meaningless, but does happen to contain the [replacement] image over the still accessible text, the small break is a pause and conveniently breaks the line into two lines, then displays the secondary text that is in a way visually better -- without styles, that is, as it's not seen if styles are enabled. Moreover, I don't think it's in any way damaging doing it this way, and it's not bad for feeding search engines. This is the only time I will use h1 on any page. Next up is h2. I also use small to contain author credit line and other bits of less important content. Again, this is a practice I feel comfortable with. I'm not saying it is the right way. There are many methods as have been explored here. This one just happens to be mine. Cheers. Mike Cherim [1] http://accessites.org/ ******************************************************************* List Guidelines: http://webstandardsgroup.org/mail/guidelines.cfm Unsubscribe: http://webstandardsgroup.org/join/unsubscribe.cfm Help: [EMAIL PROTECTED] *******************************************************************