I think there should be 2 ... one for top level frames and one that is exhaustive.
Not that both features are necessary out of the gate ... top level frames would be a good start . j. On 8/3/05, Paul Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ah, good point. Should it perhaps only iterate the top level frames? > > and if you wanted lower level frames, you would apply an iterator to that > frame. Seems like this way would save me work;-) But probably be less > intuiitive. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Bret Pettichord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wednesday, August 3, 2005 2:35 am > Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] I have a couple of questions... > > > At 10:33 PM 8/2/2005, Paul Rogers wrote: > > >I want to add a frame iterator object as soon as I get the chance: > > > > > >Ie.frames.each {|f| .... } > > > > > >When that's, there, it would be simple for you to add your 'click > > a link > > >in any frame' method. It wont be this release though. > > > > > >Paul > > > > This will be harder than the other iterators because frame > > collections can > > be nested. If you only search document.frames[], you won't > > actually > > traverse all of the frames. > > > > > > > > _____________________ > > Bret Pettichord > > www.pettichord.com > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Wtr-general mailing list > > Wtr-general@rubyforge.org > > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-general mailing list > Wtr-general@rubyforge.org > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general > -- "So long, and thanks for all the fish" Jeff Wood _______________________________________________ Wtr-general mailing list Wtr-general@rubyforge.org http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general