On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 01:57:30 +0200, Mads Lindstrøm wrote: > Besides the overly verbose syntax, I did not feel like XSLT were a good > match for the task.
I realise you weren't talking about the syntax, but in case it plays a role in this, there is always PXSL, which has significantly dampened my dislike of all things XML http://community.moertel.com/pxsl/ PXSL also has some XSLT shortcuts which are handy... > It was hard to factor out common patterns - aka. the > composability of XSLT seems poor. But this may just be my lack of > experience with XSLT. If I could have done something smarter I am all > ears. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgprgIFShrc0h.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
