Hi, Doug Currie wrote: > Sunday, December 17, 2006, 8:46:45 AM, Hakki Dogusan wrote: > >> It may be a radical change but, what about making >> lua as -weak- requirement? > >> - if user already has lua installed use it, install only wxLua >> - otherwise build and install lua and wxLua > > Would this make it possible to use, e.g., LuaJIT, or a patched Lua? > This would be a great feature, though another potential source of > problems, of course. > > I build Lua from official sources using 'make mingw' and end up with a > library called lua51.dll -- wxLua seems to use a library name with an > extra dot. Can I provide the Lua library name to wxLua config? > > e >
I'm building lua with Code::Blocks. I don't remember why I'm using this name :) Maybe it was talked at lua mail list. Didn't notice the name of the dll generated by "make mingw". There is following note on: http://luabinaries.luaforge.net/ # [04/Mar/2006] * Lua 5.1 - Release 1 File names now use the suffix "5.1" instead of "51". -- Regards, Hakki Dogusan ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ wxlua-users mailing list wxlua-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxlua-users
