On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Benjamin Eberlei <kont...@beberlei.de> wrote: > The naming is completely undecided yet, we have contacted apache > trademarks, since we don't know how to proceed.
I can confirm this has made its way into some private mailinglists and people are discussing it already. Cheers > > Also i agree with julien, the inactivity was the major reason to retire > from ASF, since we couldnt follow procedure with quarterly reports anymore > due to lack of time and didnt manage to get a first release under Apache > flag out. > > The seperation of components into their own repositories are also done to > seperate the maintained from the unmaintained ones more easily :-) > > On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM, Julien Vermillard > <jvermill...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Even if I think it's a good idea to keep the community in the loop I >> would like to remeber two points : >> - the zeta podling retirement vote was start due to lack of progress >> - if you want to use the Apache/ASF word you need to contact the >> Apache PR for that >> >> Julien >> >> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Nicolas Pastorino <n...@ez.no> wrote: >> > Dear everyone, >> > >> > I thought it would be wise to keep the eZ Publish Community in the loop, >> > since they are likely to be the largest share of AZC users today. >> > >> > Here is a small blog-post, on which I would love to have your input : >> > >> https://docs.google.com/a/ez.no/document/d/1SLuBI6HQqX_PJnswCOaV6MyW2AbOd0-1wTDwhHIf3f4/edit >> > (anyone >> > should be able to edit it, or make remarks through comments). >> > >> > I hope this fits you well and I am looking forward to your feedback ! >> > -- >> > Nicolas >> -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de
