One "PS"
why say 4294967295 in the spec where 0xFFFFFFFF is probably
more immediately to most programmers that it is not a random
choice of number ?

-phil


On 12/7/16, 4:56 PM, Philip Race wrote:
+1

Yes, it needs a CCC update. A quick "bug fix" one.

-phil.

On 12/6/16, 2:03 PM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Please review at your convenience:

Issue:    https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169728
Patch:    http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169728/webrev.00/

To the primary constructor TIFFField(TIFFTag,int,int,Object), add some range checks for TIFF_LONG, TIFF_RATIONAL, and TIFF_IFD_POINTER, and some array size checks for TIFF_RATIONAL and TIFF_SRATIONAL.

Does the new IllegalArgumentException case warrant a CCC review?

Thanks,

Brian

Reply via email to