+1
-phil.
On 12/09/2016 11:18 AM, Brian Burkhalter wrote:
Forgot to include a link to the updated patch:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169728/webrev.01/
<http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ebpb/8169728/webrev.01/>
Thanks,
Brian
On Dec 8, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Brian Burkhalter
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
The patch has been updated as suggested and the test has been
modified to verify the changes [1]. Note that this patch is with
respect to the repository with the patch for [2] already applied.
Thanks,
Brian
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-December/007993.html
[2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169725
On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Brian Burkhalter
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
No particular reason. I suspect you are correct that it is more
recognizable so I’ll change it.
Thanks,
Brian
On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Philip Race <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
One "PS"
why say4294967295in the spec where 0xFFFFFFFF is probably
more immediately to most programmers that it is not a random
choice of number ?
