Forgot to include a link to the updated patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~bpb/8169728/webrev.01/
Thanks, Brian On Dec 8, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Brian Burkhalter <[email protected]> wrote: > The patch has been updated as suggested and the test has been modified to > verify the changes [1]. Note that this patch is with respect to the > repository with the patch for [2] already applied. > > Thanks, > > Brian > > [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-December/007993.html > [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169725 > > On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Brian Burkhalter <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> No particular reason. I suspect you are correct that it is more recognizable >> so I’ll change it. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian >> >> On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Philip Race <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> One "PS" >>> why say 4294967295 in the spec where 0xFFFFFFFF is probably >>> more immediately to most programmers that it is not a random >>> choice of number ? >> >
