The patch has been updated as suggested and the test has been modified to verify the changes [1]. Note that this patch is with respect to the repository with the patch for [2] already applied.
Thanks, Brian [1] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-December/007993.html [2] https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8169725 On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:04 PM, Brian Burkhalter <[email protected]> wrote: > No particular reason. I suspect you are correct that it is more recognizable > so I’ll change it. > > Thanks, > > Brian > > On Dec 7, 2016, at 5:01 PM, Philip Race <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One "PS" >> why say 4294967295 in the spec where 0xFFFFFFFF is probably >> more immediately to most programmers that it is not a random >> choice of number ? >
