I remember John Peel sayin' in an interview that there's only 2 forms of
music in the world as far as he was concerned, good & bad. And that that's
down to personal opinion. I agree wholeheartedly.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 12 February 2003 17:20
To: Mark S. Krüx; Brendan Nelson; spw; Andrew; 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) what is *your* definition of techno?/ (techno rant)


well that definition beats the "its black music" bullshxt
that this list normally spews.

I'm sick of everyone catagorizing and labeling everything
into the fxcking ground.  how about these labels:

like

or

dislike

no music is "bad" its an artform and subjective by nature.
 so you dont like techno or trance or jazz, ect, who are
you to tell anyone that its bad music?  food for though :)

-Joe





>>Brendan >Out of interest, what is *your* definition of
techno?

I like UR's definition:

'Techno is a music based in experimentation;
It is sacred to no one race; it has no definitive sound.
It is music for the future of the human race.' - UR

Peace,

m*

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet.
The service is powered by MessageLabs: http://www.star.net.uk

Reply via email to