I remember John Peel sayin' in an interview that there's only 2 forms of music in the world as far as he was concerned, good & bad. And that that's down to personal opinion. I agree wholeheartedly.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 12 February 2003 17:20 To: Mark S. Krüx; Brendan Nelson; spw; Andrew; 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) what is *your* definition of techno?/ (techno rant) well that definition beats the "its black music" bullshxt that this list normally spews. I'm sick of everyone catagorizing and labeling everything into the fxcking ground. how about these labels: like or dislike no music is "bad" its an artform and subjective by nature. so you dont like techno or trance or jazz, ect, who are you to tell anyone that its bad music? food for though :) -Joe >>Brendan >Out of interest, what is *your* definition of techno? I like UR's definition: 'Techno is a music based in experimentation; It is sacred to no one race; it has no definitive sound. It is music for the future of the human race.' - UR Peace, m* ________________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The service is powered by MessageLabs: http://www.star.net.uk