Ah yes it was - thanks Robert
"Robert Taylor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
4.co.uk> cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Org" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: (313) Muzik (was 7
Magazine)
07/03/03 11:32 AM
I think this was meant for the list!
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:30 PM
To: Robert Taylor
Subject: RE: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)
that's true -
does anyone know what happens to back issues when a magazine goes under? I
would assume that they have a small stockpile of them. I do appreciate some
older issues of the magazine that I have (before they were all lifestyle
and drugs sh*t) and I'm wondering who would I contact now to get other back
issues?
I suppose someone at IPC would handle it - anyone have a contact?
I'm a media slut
MEK
"Robert Taylor"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Tom
4.co.uk> Churchill"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc: "313"
<[email protected]>, "Cyclone
07/03/03 11:18 AM Wehner"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: RE: (313) Muzik
(was 7 Magazine)
I think the net and lists like this one have taken over as the source for
information on dance music.
The mags did not realise this and thought they had to include more and more
"lifestyle" articles at the expense of record reviews and their sales
slumped even further, hence the crisis.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Tom Churchill
Cc: 313; Cyclone Wehner
Subject: Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine)
"In contrast, rock titles, such as New Musical Express and Kerrang!, and
magazines aimed at older music fans, such as Mojo and Uncut, have enjoyed
circulation increases."
I think there is your answer. The clubbers are growing up and are getting
tired of the same old dance music - or at least the way it's presented. I
wonder how XLR8R, URB, and other US mags are doing? There still seems to be
a lot of kids still learning and listening to dance music in the US as
opposed to the UK? correct me if I'm wrong please.
MEK
Tom Churchill
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cyclone Wehner
rdings.com>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313
<[email protected]>
07/03/03 02:43 AM cc:
Subject: Re: (313) Muzik
(was 7 Magazine)
> Yeah, that's a surprise.
> Wonder why?
> What's the talk?
Full story:
http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,988334,00.html
Cheers,
Tom
#####################################################################################
Note:
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You.
#####################################################################################
#####################################################################################
Note:
Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily
represent
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated.
This email
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use
of the
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this
email in
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank You.
#####################################################################################
