It seems to me there's more music, more interesting music, more experimentation and less musical elitism than there has been since (for me) 1990-91...this isn't a DEAD music, just a lot of the parasites have moved off to feed somewhere else...
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 4 July 2003 12:54 p.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Tom Churchill; 313; Cyclone Wehner Subject: Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine) you are so wrong it hurts. but i don't feel like getting into the whole death of dance music in america. but it is DEAD!!! Trust me- Even England during this slow time has a much bigger dance music scene than America ever did, even at its peak. On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > "In contrast, rock titles, such as New Musical Express and Kerrang!, and > magazines aimed at older music fans, such as Mojo and Uncut, have enjoyed > circulation increases." > > I think there is your answer. The clubbers are growing up and are getting > tired of the same old dance music - or at least the way it's presented. I > wonder how XLR8R, URB, and other US mags are doing? There still seems to be > a lot of kids still learning and listening to dance music in the US as > opposed to the UK? correct me if I'm wrong please. > > MEK > > > > Tom Churchill > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Cyclone Wehner > rdings.com> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 313 > <[email protected]> > 07/03/03 02:43 AM cc: > Subject: Re: (313) Muzik (was 7 Magazine) > > > > > > > Yeah, that's a surprise. > > Wonder why? > > What's the talk? > > Full story: > > http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,988334,00.html > > Cheers, > > Tom > > > > > > >
