---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Stoddard, Kamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Yeah dawg the edit of dazz on the mike clark gets me (and
everyone else in earshot) every
>time. That 12 is a perfect example of editing to fit the need.
yeah ive been bringing it out again the last couple times ive
played records, though i havent played it any of those times. this
saturday night im gonna drop it!
> And in my book if you add anything (organs) that weren't in the
original, it's not an
>edit. Krivit used to do good ones, but I think it's the "cool
factor" (read as $$) now for
>him. Or maybe he just hears music differently now than he did then.
>
> And I don't care what theo sez, those early tracks were not
edits in any way. They were
>sample based productions or mashups at best (still so good it
hurts though). using parts of
>different songs automatically knocks it out of edit territory.
not to argue semantics, but krivit's most classic edit "love is
the message" uses keys sampled from a fela kuti track. and at
least one of theo's ugly edits uses a couple versions of the same
song in the edit. i dont think the line is that clear....
>But he's the man whether he does edits, samples, trax, or
mashups. But that's why I was
>excluding theo, I didn't want to jock him anymore than I had to.
See Tom, look what you
>made me do. Now it's another theo thread. :)
i dont know why people get sick of those! i never do ;)
tom
________________________________________________________________
andythepooh.com
