>not to argue semantics, but krivit's most classic edit "love is the message" >uses keys sampled >from a fela kuti track. and at least one of theo's ugly >edits uses a couple versions of the same >song in the edit. i dont think the >line is that clear....
True. Good point. Conceded. Even though theo's at least stuck to the same track. I guess coming from a hip-hop background, where a track might just be four samples from different tracks and nothing else, that line needed to be clearer. But like I said. Maybe these codes are outdated and have no place in the current context. I don't really mind as long as it sounds good, mixes well and works the muthafxcking crowd (and a few synapses wouldn't hurt). I can't wait 'till my sons are raiding my crates to do edits of "those old techno tracks". They'll be all, "man why the fxck is that squeal in there? Uggh chop it dude. Hahahahaha! Kamal K. Stoddard Turner Broadcasting Systems > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 5:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: (313) Edit code of honour (was newish soundstream EP) > > ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- > From: "Stoddard, Kamal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Yeah dawg the edit of dazz on the mike clark gets me (and > everyone else in earshot) every > >time. That 12 is a perfect example of editing to fit the need. > > yeah ive been bringing it out again the last couple times ive > played records, though i havent played it any of those times. > this saturday night im gonna drop it! > > > And in my book if you add anything (organs) that weren't in the > original, it's not an > >edit. Krivit used to do good ones, but I think it's the "cool > factor" (read as $$) now for > >him. Or maybe he just hears music differently now than he did then. > > > > And I don't care what theo sez, those early tracks were not > edits in any way. They were > >sample based productions or mashups at best (still so good it > hurts though). using parts of > >different songs automatically knocks it out of edit territory. > > not to argue semantics, but krivit's most classic edit "love > is the message" uses keys sampled from a fela kuti track. and > at least one of theo's ugly edits uses a couple versions of > the same song in the edit. i dont think the line is that clear.... > > >But he's the man whether he does edits, samples, trax, or > mashups. But that's why I was > >excluding theo, I didn't want to jock him anymore than I had to. > See Tom, look what you > >made me do. Now it's another theo thread. :) > > i dont know why people get sick of those! i never do ;) > > tom > > ________________________________________________________________ > andythepooh.com > > > > >
