Arlene,,,, is this some kind of a co-incidence? Coz I just bought
a Diesel denim pants worth $205... lol

hi to all!!!


--- In [email protected], "tribalknowledge" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Luxuries you can live without -- and should
> 
> $200 jeans? $800 sheets? Paying a premium now for image and brand 
> cuts into our real quality of life down the road.
> 
> By MP Dunleavey
> 
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but it wasn't that long ago when the mere 
> concept of Williams-Sonoma (or Restoration Hardware, Crate & 
Barrel, 
> et. al.) would have struck most folks as . . . nutty.
> 
> Oh sure, I'll pay a premium price to buy upscale versions of 
ordinary 
> stuff -- replacing functional things I already own -- because my 
> lifestyle must reek of affluence!
> 
> Thirty years ago, people would have scoffed at such vanity. Today, 
> inundated by high-end specialty stores in every corner of the 
retail 
> market, more and more Americans are succumbing to the siren song 
of 
> these so-called affordable luxuries. And at what cost?
> 
> A case of 'affluenza'
> In his book "Luxury Fever," economist Robert Frank describes the 
rise 
> of this swankier-is-better mentality -- and the toll it's taking 
on 
> people's financial lives. "Although it is the mansions of the 
super-
> rich that attract attention -- homes of 15,000, 20,000, even 
40,000 
> square feet -- the far more newsworthy fact is that the area of 
the 
> average house built in the United States is now more than roughly 
> twice what it was in the '70s," he writes.
> 
> The trappings of affluence are no longer limited to those who can 
> afford them. Increasingly, middle-class Americans will pay top 
dollar 
> just to have the veneer of luxury -- and retailers, wizards that 
they 
> are, continue to provide the fantasy of wealth, even when all 
you're 
> buying is a garden trowel. 
> 
> The things we can't live without
> In case you have NO idea what I'm talking about, please scroll 
> through this list of once-ordinary goods and services that now 
come 
> in versions ranging from the merely overpriced to the truly 
> outrageous: 
> �     Pots: Now known as "cookware." Please think nothing of 
paying 
> $125 for an All-Clad omelette pan. Eggs not included.
> 
> �     Jeans: The $200 pair of designer denims is back. Which is 
> good, because that pair of $75 Diesels just isn't cutting it 
anymore.
>  
> �     Knives: Still called "knives," but a set of prestige 
Henckels 
> can set you back up to $1,500. 
> 
> �     Cosmetics: The switch from Vaseline Intensive Care lotions 
> ($2.49) to skin-sensitive Neutrogena ($7.99) is a slippery slope 
to 
> Kiehls ($25) -- but then why not go ahead and splurge on La Mer, 
> which starts at $90 for a fraction of an ounce. 
> 
> �     Strollers: There's no limit to what you can splurge on baby 
> gear, so I'll just use this brief example: If you invested the 
$700 
> you're inclined to spend on the trendy Bugaboo stroller, your 
child 
> could retire with an extra $100,000.
> 
> �     Sheets: Now called "linens." It's amazing that people can 
> justify paying $800 for 1,000-threadcount Royal Crest sheets when 
20 
> years ago no one had any idea how many threads per inch their 
sheets 
> had.
> 
> �     Sneakers: Now called "athletic footwear," and they have us 
> paying $150 for a pair of Air Jordans instead of $25 for a pair of 
> Keds. But price isn't the only problem. We also expect to own 
several 
> pairs for all the sports we do.
> 
> �     Watches: Now they're "timepieces, but it's no longer about 
> telling the time. For about $20, you can buy a watch with a quartz 
> movement that won't lose a minute in the next 10,000 years. But 
even 
> without the optional encrustation of diamonds, you'll still fork 
over 
> $7,500 and up for a Rolex President or pay a couple hundred 
thousand 
> for a Cartier watch. And we're still talking about a plain-looking 
> gold watch -- not something Liberace would have worn.
> 
> �     Chocolates: It was the humble Hershey Bar that won WWII. 
Then 
> along came Godiva at $16 a pound. But why not spend $84 a pound on 
> Debauve & Gallais chocolates with (note all the place-specific 
names 
> that make ordinary ingredients sound exotic) Piedmont hazelnuts, 
> Turkish grapes, Bourbon Island vanilla and West Indies rum as 
> ingredients. Now, try saying that list of ingredients without the 
> place names and see if you still want to cough up $84.
> 
> �     Scotch: I can remember when people used to get excited about 
> a bottle of Johnnie Walker Black, which will set you back about 
$50 
> these days. How could we have been so pedestrian? Now, nothing 
less 
> than 30-year-old single malt will do. Price tag: $250 and up.
> 
> �     Bathrobes: You can get a nice flannel for about $50, or one 
> made from Egyptian cotton (what's wrong with Texas cotton, 
anyway?) 
> for $250. But really, the one we're all secretly lusting after is 
the 
> $6,000 Daniel Hanson robe constructed (not made) with silk-trimmed 
> pashmina. And where the hell did pashmina come from? Cashmere 
wasn't 
> good enough anymore?
> 
> �     TV: Sure, you could spend $700 for a 36-inch conventional 
TV, 
> but that's so '90s. Why not spend $5,000 for a 60-inch plasma 
screen? 
> It'll only cost you a few thousand more to acquire a house with a 
> living room big enough. 
> 
> �     Wine glasses: Now called "wine stems," shelling out $130 for 
> a set of six Riedel glasses is just the beginning. Now you need 
eight 
> sets, each with a slightly different shape to "enhance individual 
> grape varieties and styles of wine." And to think I used to 
believe 
> that what was in my 6-for-$6 Ikea glass was all that mattered.
> 
> Many of these examples show that no matter how much you're willing 
to 
> spend for a little luxury, there will always be a newer, better 
> version out there that's beyond reach, taunting you. It's an arms 
> race that pits the middle class against the upper-middle, who in 
turn 
> are striving with the rich, who are struggling to live like the 
super-
> rich.
> 
> But it's an arms race all but the wealthiest are destined to lose. 
In 
> the last five years, "the top 1% of earners have seen their wages 
> shoot up like a rocket," says economist Chuck Collins, senior 
program 
> developer at United for a Fair Economy, a research group in 
Boston. 
> 
> Not so for the rest of us, writes Frank: "Middle- and low-income 
> families have had to finance their higher spending by a lower rate 
of 
> savings and sharply rising debt."
> 
> Retail therapy
> If all these upscale purchases put the financial screws to the 
> average Joe, whose dollar is already stretched, why does it 
continue?
> 
> It's tempting to buy into the "quality is worth paying for" 
rationale 
> some would have you believe. But often the difference in quality 
is 
> all but undetectable. Can your body really tell the difference 
> between 300 and 1,000 threads per inch? We like to think of 
ourselves 
> as connoisseurs, but how many people can really taste the 
difference 
> between 30- and 40-year-old scotch? 
> 
> Sometimes, the difference in quality is real, but the price you 
have 
> to pay for it far exceeds whatever you might gain in durability, 
> usefulness or design. A silk-trimmed pashmina bathrobe can be a 
> beautiful thing, but $6,000? Please!
> 
> In reality, many of us use these splurges, affordable or not, to 
make 
> ourselves feel better. Paco Underhill, a retail analyst and author 
> of "The Call of the Mall," says acquiring various high-end 
> lifestyle "accessories" gives a psychological lift to people "who 
> have had to compromise on other things," he says. "They'd like to 
> drive a Jaguar, but can't afford it, so instead they'll carry a 
Coach 
> bag."
> 
> The price we pay
> Sadly, this cycle of spending on image and brand tends to 
escalate. 
> What was once a luxury or a one-time splurge quickly becomes a 
> necessity. Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert dubbed it a pattern 
> of "miswanting" -- because what people want (i.e. a life of wealth 
> and luxury) can't be fulfilled just by acquiring the trappings of 
it. 
> 
> And what's worse is that trying to buy the appearance of luxury 
can 
> become a roadblock that stops you from building up your own, true 
> wealth. Because -- as impressed as your friends are by your 
> pricey "stems" or $700 stroller -- that's just money going toward 
a 
> fantasy, instead of being invested in a way that might truly 
enhance 
> your quality of life someday.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
DonorsChoose. A simple way to provide underprivileged children resources 
often lacking in public schools. Fund a student project in NYC/NC today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KZzaMD/.WnJAA/HwKMAA/oNXolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

Ask our other classmates to subscribe, tell them to send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/4c-math94/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to