Thanks Tom. Are you using the SQL LOGIN command to do your compares? > On Sep 8, 2016, at 9:23 AM, Benedict, Tom <tom.bened...@optum.com> wrote: > > Arnaud de Montard writes: > >>> Le 8 sept. 2016 à 08:29, Guy Algot >>> <g...@macjedi.ca<mailto:g...@macjedi.ca>> a écrit : >>> >>> Given v15s current tickle trunk of features, what would be a good way to >>> send data between servers across the WAN? >>> >>> In the past, I've done it by bundling up the data in a BLOB and dropping it >>> on a secure FTP site. Any better, faster, stronger methods one prefers? >>> Thanks. > >> If the source server can connect to the target one, I've made something like >> this last year with SQL. It's >> hard to say that it will be faster than an intermediate text file... Source >> and target share the same structure? > > I agree with Arnaud. Using SQL allows you to control security and > availability totally within your app. As long as you are in control of both > 4D servers. I doubt it would be slower than using a share. > > On a related subject... We use SQL to compare configuration data between our > Production, QA and Dev servers. We don't send updates between servers yet > though. > > HTH, > > Tom Benedict > Optum >
********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
