I hate working on other developer's code where I am expected to guess the type by its use and context. It is a waste of my time and therefore a waste of my client's money.
It is often possible to correct/optimise code without understanding the context. I was a photographer in a previous life, and I often look for variations in the 'look' of code to discover anomalies. I think Module + Descriptor + Type is perfect for method names, but not for variables. On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 4:29 AM, David Adams via 4D_Tech < [email protected]> wrote: > Here's one of those thoughts that I think to repost every few years. > > > Of course, no one uses that particular format as it's use will later > condemn you to the pits of perdition. Instead, people are probably using: > > Module + Descriptor + Type > > Like > > Customer_City_t > > -- Jim Dorrance [email protected] [email protected] www.4d.dorrance.eu PS: If you know of anyone that needs an experienced 4D programmer to add energy and experience to their team, please let me know. I have experience in many areas. Reasonable rates. Remote or Paris only. ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) FAQ: http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
