I find the forums a throw back to - what, late '90s BBs or Compuserve. I
know a lot of you remember Compuserve. We complain about the forums and get
told that we're just not doing it correctly. This has been going on for
years. If it were actually true we would all be over on the forums because
we're actually pretty smart and would figure out the forums are actually
good. But we aren't because the forum interface isn't very good and telling
everyone it is doesn't actually make it so.

No one around here would consider such a site a success when you have to
write a tech note to explain how to use it.

I mean really.

On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 6:44 PM, David Adams via 4D_Tech <
[email protected]> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 11:27 AM, Arnaud de Montard via 4D_Tech <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the links.
>
> I've spent more than enough time criticizing the forums down the years to
> continue doing so. I was jus trying to say that it's not weird that I
> couldn't figure out how parts of it work.
>
> Since 4D officially takes no notice of the NUG, I'm trying putting comments
> and requests on the Forums. There they can be unofficially ignored ;-)
>
> --
Kirk Brooks
San Francisco, CA
=======================
**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
FAQ:  http://lists.4d.com/faqnug.html
Archive:  http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: http://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub:  mailto:[email protected]
**********************************************************************

Reply via email to