On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:38 AM Milan Adamov via 4D_Tech < 4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote:
> If you are using any new feature from v16 R6 that are not in v16 line, the > answer is no. You should upgrade to v17 instead. For example, object > notation (which became available in v16 R4) is not available in v16.5. > > If you are not using any new features available in v16 R6 then why use R > version in a first place? > > Wouldn't it be less confusing if 4D called v16 R6 something other than v16 , because the v16 R6 new features will never be released in a v16 upgrade. jim.dorra...@gmail.com 4...@dorrance.eu www.4d.dorrance.eu PS: If you know of anyone that needs an experienced 4D programmer to add energy and experience to their team, please let me know. I have experience in many areas. Reasonable rates. Remote or Paris only. ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
