Thanks
Ferdinando
Il 12/03/2019 20:00, [email protected] ha scritto:
Message: 5
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2019 16:11:11 +0100
From: Jim Dorrance<[email protected]>
To: 4D iNug Technical<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: 4D V16 R6 Vs 4D V16.5
Message-ID:
<cagazoc49gztkz5nzauvuumjuabvtrol58g4wh898arfu5_-...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
On Tue, Mar 12, 2019 at 10:38 AM Milan Adamov via 4D_Tech <
[email protected]> wrote:
If you are using any new feature from v16 R6 that are not in v16 line, the
answer is no. You should upgrade to v17 instead. For example, object
notation (which became available in v16 R4) is not available in v16.5.
If you are not using any new features available in v16 R6 then why use R
version in a first place?
Wouldn't it be less confusing if 4D called v16 R6 something other
than v16 , because the v16 R6 new features will never be released in a v16
upgrade.
[email protected]
[email protected]
www.4d.dorrance.eu
PS: If you know of anyone that needs an experienced 4D programmer to add
energy and experience to their team, please let me know. I have
experience in many areas. Reasonable rates. Remote or Paris only.
**********************************************************************
4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG)
Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html
Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech
Unsub: mailto:[email protected]
**********************************************************************
