Thanks to all for your opinions. I think I am well on way. > On Apr 25, 2020, at 9:40 PM, Chip Scheide <[email protected]> wrote: > > A note: you can do all the things you need to do with pictures, UUIDs etc in > v13 in preparation for v15+ > > >> Ken, >> >>> On Apr 24, 2020, at 6:41 PM, Kenneth Geiger via 4D_Tech >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, this is why I’m trying to get their 4D System to point where >>> it will run on a version of 4D that is happy on Win10. The only >>> reason I mentioned Win7 is if the consensus were to be that moving >>> from 4D v12 directly to 4D v15 is too big a step, I would move it >>> through v14 on my Win7 development environment. So far, nobody has >>> indicated that the jump from v12 to v15 would be a major issue. So, I >>> ’m planing to go v12 —> v15 —> v17. >> >> Personally, I never thought much of v14. It seemed bloated and >> unstable. I liked v13 and v15. v15 also had both 32 and 64 bit >> versions. That makes it easy to use JPR’s tool to convert pictures >> in the 32 bit version and them test them in the 64 bit version. >> >> I would recommend v13 -> v15 -> v17. >> >> >> Randy Kaempen >> Intellex Corporation >> >> ********************************************************************** >> 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) >> Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html >> Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech >> Unsub: mailto:[email protected] >> ********************************************************************** > ------------ > Hell is other people > Jean-Paul Sartre
********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:[email protected] **********************************************************************
