Hi Randa, Thanks much for your input. I never did very much with v14 at all. I guess it is time to stat biting the bullet!
Regards, Ken > On Apr 24, 2020, at 6:38 PM, Randy Kaempen <ra...@intellexcorp.com> wrote: > > Ken, > >> On Apr 24, 2020, at 6:41 PM, Kenneth Geiger via 4D_Tech >> <4d_tech@lists.4d.com> wrote: >> >> Yes, this is why I’m trying to get their 4D System to point where it will >> run on a version of 4D that is happy on Win10. The only reason I mentioned >> Win7 is if the consensus were to be that moving from 4D v12 directly to 4D >> v15 is too big a step, I would move it through v14 on my Win7 development >> environment. So far, nobody has indicated that the jump from v12 to v15 >> would be a major issue. So, I’m planing to go v12 —> v15 —> v17. > > Personally, I never thought much of v14. It seemed bloated and unstable. I > liked v13 and v15. v15 also had both 32 and 64 bit versions. That makes it > easy to use JPR’s tool to convert pictures in the 32 bit version and them > test them in the 64 bit version. > > I would recommend v13 -> v15 -> v17. > > > Randy Kaempen > Intellex Corporation > ********************************************************************** 4D Internet Users Group (4D iNUG) Archive: http://lists.4d.com/archives.html Options: https://lists.4d.com/mailman/options/4d_tech Unsub: mailto:4d_tech-unsubscr...@lists.4d.com **********************************************************************
