-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Just to take a step back, what problem are we solving here? Are we just adding complexity to the installer for no good reason? I am not saying that we should not do it, only that there should be a good reason for doing so. If there is a good reason, there is still a long list of things to do for 3.0, where would this sit on the list of priorities?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknKl+EACgkQwRXgH3rKGfPPuwCfZYzaVXLloJjPyYTdxk2rLvXP JMEAn0u3Xh+mx5VRYwvM8zZ/wyxm6zqk =x0tR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
