Gustin Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Just to take a step back, what problem are we solving here? Are we just > adding complexity to the installer for no good reason? I am not saying > that we should not do it, only that there should be a good reason for > doing so. If there is a good reason, there is still a long list of > things to do for 3.0, where would this sit on the list of priorities? > > If your aim is also to convert people from other OS to using Linux, in this case 64studio (and it seems it was a goal when discussing the desktop manager (Gnome, good for Windows converts)), then it will make installing 64studio more easy. And you know, those guys want it to be easy ;)
I'm talking about the win32 installer, got my doubts about WUBI. \r _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
