-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ralf Mardorf wrote: > Grammostola Rosea wrote: >> got my doubts about WUBI.
As do I. > > Anyhow WUBI has the advantage that it will support many FLOSS > applications installed to a windows, even if a reboot is needed. It It is just another method of installing Linux. That is all it is. Once installed it is really no different from a users perspective than a conventionally installed Ubuntu > won't get lost like Live-CDs, it can be set to the users needs, it's Any Ubuntu/Debian/Red Hat/Fedora/<insert distro of choice> can be made to fit a users needs. WUBI brings nothing new to the table here. > easier than to install many FLOSS applications by the Windows versions, > and all rumours about Linux killing Windows by a regular install are null. > The goal of Open Source is not to "kill" Windows or OSX. The goal is to make the best software possible. The developers I have met seem to take this approach at any rate. Worrying about market share is not all that useful if you are measuring success with quality. Again, all I asked is that the OP step back and identify the problem he is trying to fix. Using vague terms like "simpler" and "easier" is not as helpful as it seems. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAknK1iUACgkQwRXgH3rKGfMT5ACdH0Qtlx27u/YoLAXtf7fNA7qO VqgAn2Dx6hHafooJIklnQuI2ZfZTjofO =FMln -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
