Gustin Johnson wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: > >> Hi :) >> >> I know, I only need to use Google, read and fix what's wrong. But I hope >> a 3.0 release version is better than the beta version. >> >> > Are you serious? Do you know what beta means from the perspective of a > software release? >
Hardy isn't beta, so PPPoE etc. should be easy to use and not to be something that needs to be set up with each boot. >> A multimedia distro should be fine with standard multimedia >> applications, but the beta isn't. >> >> > I think you are confusing standard desktop app with multi-media > *production* applications. Neither tunapie nor Firefox use jack. > Tunapie is also not part of a standard install. It is also not an > officially supported package, but is instead a community maintained > package. If it does not do what you want or need it to do, then your > choice is to fix it yourself, pay someone to fix it, convince someone to > fix it. In the end it boils down to taking responsibility for your own > experience. > Or people like me simply use other distros that are fine with PPPoE, flashplayer and packages like TunaPie if 64 Studio stays that new way. But I don't think you are the distro, you seems to be just one of those nerds who won't to keep everything complicated. I think I know the reason for this, but this is OT. If you produce, you also need to know if it's fine with consumer applications. Multimedia means multimedia. I hope suggestions are still welcome. I hope this still is a user list. > There are compromises depending on what you want your system to do. > This is also true of Windows btw. If I want real low latency you have > to disable the Win2000/XP HAL, of course system stability and IRQ > management suffer, but it all boils down to figuring out what you need > and then taking responsibility to make it happen. > I didn't do that for Windows and never heard of such low latencies for Envy24 cards with Linux from anybody. You're writing pure nonsense. And what has got Windows to do with Linux troubles? I guess Ubuntu is a worse distro, a lot is fine with 64 Studio 2.1, that should be fine with Hardy too, e.g. a working flashplayer-nonfree package, PPPoE. >> Right now I just want to watch a YouTube link a friend sent me, I don't >> want to set up my Linux. Some days ago I just wanted to listen a radio >> > > Then use a Desktop orientated distro. Or perhaps Linux is not for you. > Either way, figure out what you need/want from your computer, then > find a solution that works. It may be Linux, it may not be. The choice > and the responsibility are yours. > I don't have any scared cows. At the moment Suse 11.0, 11.1 and 64 Studio 2.1 Etch and Lenny are fine for most work and Windows XP is fine for music productions, so I have got everything I need. I still wish to help to get 64 Studio 3.0 a distro that is fine for my needs too and maybe for the needs of other people that have different needs to you. Why are you always so aggressive ;)? Cheers, Ralf _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
