Hi Quentin :) > Hi Ralf, > > Thanks for driving the "better Midi" bus. People are often content > with "It works for me" and if you can somehow find a solution to your > problems, it will benefit all. Just take care not to drop rant bombs > on lists (2 or more mails on the same topic in close proximity). This > causes a lot of unhappiness, and people will most often than not > delete the whole lot at once. A good example would be the recent dbus > fight on jack. I read the first few, and now ignore any Jackd mails > to do with dbus.
You're right, I anger about myself. I should bring into focus to compile JACK to get the development package and then Qtractor. I was pissed because of the dbus-pa-thread and amused about the self-ironic email at LAD because of a change for LADSPA and an imaginable flameware because of this. > Yes, I understand what you are saying, in that some of the top > mastering houses still use their horrendously expensive analogue > equipment. Just know that the main reason why they dis digital > mastering is BECAUSE they paid so much for those mastering riggs, and > want to maintain exclusivity. > > I find it humorous that people would actually fall for this publicity > stunt, because the highest frequency that the CD can reproduce > according to the same Nyquist–Shannon sampling > theorem is a mere 22kHz, but practically only about 20kHz. Okay, I'm using op-amps, FETs and a cheap Envy24 sound card and it's good enough for me, because I only need consumer CD quality, but I want point out, that no digital equipment can be seen as 100% perfect. It's not only the frequency response, if you don't use op-amps and tubes instead of FETs and analogue tapes, here are many advantages, e.g. the saturation and response characteristic that can be heard on CDs and records. There are good results done with Ardour, but I never heard good results done with MIDI. I guess I will stop talking about this and try to figure out, how to get Qtracktor from cvs. I didn't find Information how to compile JACK2 for Debian based distros :(. Maybe I should try to get JACK2 for my 2.1 instead of the 3.0-beta and see if 2.1 then will be fine too with JACK. I still work on my audio Linux, but I'm still in a bad mood, because in no list of the once I'm subscribed too, MIDI jitter is a thread. Sorry, Ralf By the way, JACK2 and the development package for 3.0-beta also has a thread in the 64 Studio forums. > Professional is a term that, until recently, meant "You get paid for > what you do". A professional street sweeper is not a good street > sweeper, but one that gets paid to do it. > > Therefore I am a Professional Mastering Engineer - because I also get > paid to do it, even though I am using 64 Studio as my main interface. > My customers don't care what I use, because they like the product, > ultimately making me a good ME. > > Regards, > Quentin > > > > Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> Hi :) >> >> I'm ambivalent if I should waste my time or the time of any Linux coder. >> >> The latest mails I got offlist because of my unwanted suggestions on >> other mailing lists, e.g. JACK dev list, are not only discrediting >> me, but also MIDI. I wonder if developer of important basics, that >> means for the kernel, ALSA and JACK are interested in fixing Jitter. >> Another issue is, that they still deceive their self that Linux >> should be 100% professional for recording, mixing and mastering. >> Until now no OS or digital stand alone equipment is 100% >> professional, there are still a lot of studios using analogue >> equipment. Okay, I'm a blabber, but please take a look at Wiki, e.g. >> at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mastering: >> >> "There are mastering engineers who feel that digital technology, as >> of 2007, has not progressed enough in quality to supersede analog >> technology entirely. Many top mastering studios, including Bernie >> Grundman Mastering (which has mastered 37 Grammy-nominated albums), >> and Gateway Mastering, still embrace analog signal processing (such >> as analog equalization) within the mastering process. Additionally, >> the latest advances in analog mastering technology include 120V >> signal rails for previously unavailable headroom of 150dB as well as >> frequency response ranging from 3 Hz to 300 kHz.[citation needed] In >> order to duplicate this frequency response in digital domain, a >> sampling rate of at least 600 kHz would be required, by the >> Nyquist–Shannon sampling theorem. However, it is pertinent that the >> extremes in this frequency range (3 Hz - 300 kHz), are effectively >> inaudible, existing outside the range of both the human ear and most >> professional microphones." >> >> This are the experiences I made when I was engineer for Brauner. I >> don't think it's relevant for home-recording and I guess most of us >> will do home-recording or semi-pro work, but facing the truth is >> important for progress. >> >> Another issue that makes me feel pissed is, that it's not wanted to >> have many users, because Linux isn't proprietary, but not to have >> many users is the reason why hardware companies don't take enough >> care to fit to Linux. >> >> I wonder if >> >> 1. there is an interest to include a working MIDI, even if MIDI is >> e.g. "anachronistische Sondermuell" (anachronistical hazardous waste) >> like a Linux coder wrote offlist. >> >> 2. there is an interest in facing the truth abaout digital recording >> and digital recording using Linux . >> >> 3. there is an interest in making Linux popular enough to make >> companies taking care about Linux, to get drivers. >> >> *?* >> >> Some people like e.g. Rui are interested in solving MIDI jitter, but >> I got more emails offline, that I'm not wanted and that MIDI per se >> is unwanted, they say e.g. jitter makes MIDI becoming more natural. >> >> Is there a chance for Linux audio and MIDI? >> >> By the way, I also get a lot of emails offlist from users who still >> use Linux for day-to-day work, but not for audio work any more, they >> changed to Apple or Microsoft. >> >> Why is there the need to talk about that offlist and keep up >> appearances on the lists? >> >> :( >> Ralf >> >> > > -- http://www.dailywav.com/1002/beginning.wav _______________________________________________ 64studio-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users
