Sorry for the glut of mails, especially to Rui who is dedicated to fix 
the trouble.

If we go on talking about this, I'll only send mails to the list and not 
Cc any more.

Hi Alex :)

I'll keep my answer short ;).

alex stone wrote:
> [snip]
>
> The most obvious example of this is the perennial "Are you going to
> use Pro Tools to record my album, because it's the industry standard?"
>   

Here it's called "Pro Fools".

> We'll need a lot more users in the linux audio world, pushing a
> sustained groundswell of pressure on the manufacturers, and the
> manufacturers will need to see a lot more users clamouring for their
> kit, before they get their linux feet wet.
>   

I gave back non-audio hardware that wasn't compatible to Linux and gave 
the information what I use instead from another company.

> I refute the idea that midi jitter makes work more 'natural'.

Jitter comes randomly, while human touch is influenced by the mood, e.g. 
human played syncopation have human jitter, but always in one direction, 
for the mood, the stress syncopation does, it always will be negative 
delayed human jitter, while a machine did it completely randomly. And I 
wish to move notes by ticks to control exactly what I get.

> Once again, i most respectfully ask devs to consider adding sample
> accurate jackmidi to their apps. Accurate midi IS important for some,
> and contrary to what seems a popular view, there ARE those who make a
> living using midi as part of the composition/performance/production
> process. Having an accurate foundation from which to work means the
> composer can rely on the effect he or she intends, when adding a
> degree of..."reality".
>   

:)

> For those of us who are out in the trenches, trying to present linux
> audio as the viable option we think it is for new users, this question
> comes up on a regular basis.
>
> "Is the midi in linux consistently reliable?" (With variations on the
> same theme.)

Cheers,
Ralf
_______________________________________________
64studio-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-users

Reply via email to